You actually have three choices depending on which camera you have. ![]() If you’re a Nikon user, it’s a little bit more complicated. If you’re a Canon user, you only really have one choice, the Canon 50mm f/1.8, which I linked to above. So we are slowly getting there - 10mm at a time.If you buy a product through one of our referral links we will earn a commission (without costing you anything). 40mm works better than 50mm though in my opinion, without getting too expensive. Hovever, such a camera would need a 30mm (or so) focal length, and no such cheap lenses exist. A hundred dollar lens would probably go together much better with the popular and cheaper APS-C (crop sensor) cameras. So would you really shell out over a thousand dollars on a camera body, and then less than a hundred on a lens? I hope not. However, full frame cameras are rather expensive. That said, I still feel that both lenses are a bit awkward to shoot with, because of the focal lengths.ĥ0mm works very well on a full frame camera, simply because it is a normal lens and it feels natural to shoot at that focal length. So for me, the Canon 40mm 2.8 STM Pancake is the winner. I also feel more comfortable with a lens that is less likely to just fall apart. So while the 50mm is a good choice, I would shell out a little (very little extra, actually) for the 40mm. I feel that the 50mm cannot produce good quality until around f/2.5 or so, weakening its main strong point - the f/1.8 aperture. Fast (by one and a half stop - however the image quality suffers at large apertures).So if I would start anew and were to choose between the two lenses, which one would it be? To sum it up: The Canon 50mm 1.8: Pros ![]() More Sample Shotsįor more shots taken with the 40mm, check out the Image Gallery. This is not only due to the shorter depth of field the lens just isn't sharp at f/1.8. This shot was taken at aperture f/1.8 and we can see how vignetting creeps in and how the text is less sharp than the above image. The metal mount is not just a nice touch it most probably helps preventing the stuck-on-body situation I had with the 50mm. The 40mm on the other hand, feels incredibly solid for its size. ![]() Luckily it could be forced back in but you start to understand why this thing costs so little. It once got stuck on the camera body, and it once literally fell apart - the inner part containing the front element just fell out. However, the build quality of the 50mm is absolutely terrible so I need to make an exception. Usually I wouldn't feel that the build quality is very important as long as the lens delivers it could be made out of styrofoam for all I care. So let's put the 40mm and the 50mm head-to-head to see which one wins! Build Quality Now, the price has dropped a bit, and I broke down and ordered the 40mm. At almost twice the price and without any features like optical image stabilizer, it seemed like a pretty weak product - possibly saved by the attractive compact format. Also, the aperture was a mere f/2.8 compared to f/1.8 of the cheap 50mm. A more compact lens sounded great, but why 40mm? It's not a normal lens on full frame or crop sensor. When Canon introduced the 40mm pancake lens, I was a bit confused. The 50mm next to the 40mm mounted on the Canon 600D.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |